Following my post on the resignation of UK Government Minister David Laws (in the light of Bishop Margot Käβmann’s resignation in February), there are two types of resignation in the spotlight today. I had intended to write something funny today, but the news got in the way.
Horst Köhler, President of Germany, has resigned only a year after securing a second term in office. He caused offence last week after suggesting that there can be a justification for Germany’s armed forces being involved in operations away from home in order to secure particular interests. The Left accused him of supporting ‘gunboat diplomacy’ (he doesn’t) and the Right left him to stew in his embarrassment. Today he resigned, saying he regretted that his comments could lead to a misunderstanding about a difficult question for the nation – viz Afghanistan.
So, German politics loses as its figurehead a good man with a good record because people are too stupid to listen intelligently to a comment and debate it seriously. What he said is contentious, but that is no reason for not saying it – even for a Head of State who has the best interests of his country at heart. German military involvement in Afghanistan is a hot potato in Germany right now and Margot Käβmann herself got into trouble in January when, as head of the EKD (Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland), she called for a renewed debate over the withdrawal of troops when there was a lack of vision for the conflict.
Köhler will be replaced in the interim by Jens Böhrnsen (SPD), speaker of the Bundesrat (Upper House). What is remarkably odd about all this is simply that the debate about Afghanistan will still go on, yet Germany will have lost a very good Head of State. And – as I have aksed elsewhere – who has gained what by this resignation?
However, the second resignation is arguably more serious for the wider world. This is the sense of resignation felt across the globe that Israel can do what it likes and get away with it – that in the end no one will hold Israel to account. They can build their illegal settlements, flout UN Resolutions at will, refuse to cooperate with the wider world (eg. nuclear proliferation negotiations) and commit atrocities against vulnerable people – and apart from a few sharp words, they can then carry on business as usual.
So, today they have intercepted (in international waters) the flotilla of boats taking aid to Gaza and lives have been lost. Ambassadors have been called in to explain events and protests have broken out around the world. Our own Foreign Secretary has issued a call for Israel to stop the blockade of Gaza forthwith. Whistling in the wind?
The tragedy of this is (a) that Israel’s security depends on the security of its neighbours and friends, (b) that original victimhood cannot justify making victims of others, (c) that Israel’s legitimate complaint about the violence of others towards Israel is drowned out by the horrified complaints of those offended by Israel’s own oppressive actions.
That said, however, I guess many people around a horrified world will once again be resigned to the fact that Israel will simply ignore protests and present itself as the aggrieved victim. Others, however, will now find in this action yet another sanction for further violence and less understanding.
Psalm 122.6 implores:
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem…
But the peace of Jerusalem is never seen in isolation from the call of the prophets for God’s people to love justice, exercise mercy and walk humbly with God (and, therefore, with everyone else).
May 31, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Nick,
I pray constantly for world peace, Palestine or Israel figure large in them. I can see that the perspective on Israel is swayed by some seeing them as an antidote to militant Islam? In my view, they are a focus for militant Islamic activity against not just them, but the rest of the world.
I don’t have a solution to the issue, but until Israel adopts an approach of peace among equals and starts to treat the ethnic Arab population with dignity and respect, how can they ever hope to win the argument for peace.
Reading today’s media in sad. The Telegraph appears to be set on discrediting any politician who might succeed within the coalition government. The ink is hardly dry on David Laws resignation and they have set up his successor.
It is time the Telegraph came clean about their agenda, which is now completely objectionable and makes it seem more and more a voice for extremist right wing elements in the country.
May 31, 2010 at 5:26 pm
Thanks, Nick for details of the Horst Köhler resignation. I was very impressed by his appearance in Munich, and sorry to see him go. I suspect I wouldn’t agree with his politics particularly, but there’s a flavour of “I never gave them hell; I told the truth and they thought I was giving them hell” about this.
May 31, 2010 at 9:39 pm
Thank you.
I share the frustration but ask when will the words of shock from western heads of state result in some positive action – maybe sanctions from the UN or an embargo on selling military equipment to an armed force that regularly uses disproportionately amounts of force on Palestinian civilians.
June 1, 2010 at 7:32 am
The Telegraph say they didn’t know that Laws’ landlord was his partner otherwise they would have included him last year, so his explanation that he was acting to protect his privacy does hold water, even if it is no real defence.
Whatever the Telegraph’s agenda, we need to remember that we don’t have -and never have had – a free press; we have a bought-and-paid-for press.
I think we have very high quality journalism in the UK, across the board, but Just as journalists are taught to ask of any spokesperson ‘why is this lying b****** lying to me’, we should be aware of predisposition of the papers. We should ask of every sentence in the newspaper ‘why does this journalist’s editor want us to read this?’
Most often the answer is ‘because it’s bloody good journalism’, but that’s not always the case and sometimes even when it is, it’s not the only reason.
Coverage, especially in the case of Israel, is sometimes the outcome of the battling of vested interests and strongly-held competing world views. And especially in the case of Israel, no coverage is rarely as it first presents.
June 2, 2010 at 8:27 pm
I think what Israel has done is an outrage! There was no need whatsoever for them to come in shooting! Christians must speak out!
Kurt Hill
Brooklyn, NY
June 2, 2010 at 10:53 pm
Christians should of course be outraged by any act of violence, but rather than speaking out in a political way we should be telling those in darkness that it’s only God who can ultimately sort out the problems in his Holy city of Jerusalem, which is fast becoming “a heavy stone for all peoples” (Zechariah 12). “Now when these things begin to take place, straighten up and raise your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.” (Luke 21).
“Amen. Come, Lord Jesus” (Rev 22).
June 2, 2010 at 11:19 pm
Gaz, any ‘speaking out’ that involves people is inevitably ‘political’. It challenges power – and the Bible is riddled with it.
June 2, 2010 at 11:52 pm
Sorry Nick I disagree. Deaths caused by Israel & Gaza sadden me, I wish things were different, but I view people’s spiritual health above politics. When the early church was being persecuted by the Romans, did the apostles speak out against it? No, they just preached baptism for the repentance of sins.
June 3, 2010 at 7:05 am
Gaz, that is so staggeringly ridiculous that I am almost speechless. You haven’t read the Bible.
June 3, 2010 at 7:15 am
Nick I didn’t comment on this thread to get into another argument about politics, more to say that the Israel/Gaza situation is something we should expect to happen prior to Christ’s return – war & violence happening in an utterly Godless way. If you however want to enlighten me on political & religious protest/rebellion then I’m all ears…
June 5, 2010 at 11:01 am
It’s a bit late now as most won’t read this, but please sign the Amnesty Intenational petitions over on their website. Our (or any) government won’t take action over this unless the public are vocal enough in their dissent.
Thanks,
Gareth.