There is some pretty awful stuff going on in the world, but it’s a little bit of sexism that dominated the headlines and headspace the last few days. Putin & Co. won’t learn that you can’t bomb terrorists into submission – the hard violence doesn’t deter people who are convinced they (a) have nothing to lose and (b) are earning heaven by blowing themselves up. But, Putin & Co. aren’t the only ones to think that massive force is a long-term substitute for justice.
I remember hearing Mel Brooks explaining (in defence of the tastelessly funny ’Springtime for Hitler’ in his film The Producers) that tyrants and dictators are best opposed by ridicule. Of course that’s not an argument against armed conflict per se, but it does make the point that getting people to laugh at preposterous pomposity is a good starting point for opposition. (Which is why satire is important.)
I am sure Sky has done the right thing in sacking Andy Gray for his outrageous and unprofessional sexism. They had to be seen to act – to do something in order to demonstrate that such behaviour and attitudes are unacceptable. Yet, as with other ‘unacceptable attitudes’ (racism, for example), removing the embarrassing culprit does little or nothing to change the attitude or prejudice: it merely pushes it underground. Then people who think that way just keep quiet about it.
But, I wonder if it might have been better to give Andy Gray an alternative. How about a two-hour programme in which he, the only man in the studio, is interviewed and questioned by a panel of prominent sportswomen. They could draw out his views and expose them to the ridicule they deserve. Lay them out in the cold light of day. Let them be seen for what they are. Put Gray on the rack of public entertainment rather than sack him?
And – please – let Kenny Dalglish’s daughter Kelly be chief interrogator. A former presenter on Sky Sports News, her tweet yesterday was perfect:
Phew, am exhausted. Just read about something called ‘the offside rule’. Too much for my tiny brain. Must be damaged from nail polish fumes.
January 26, 2011 at 11:16 am
Not that I wish to support Andy Gray’s remarks but this photo taken before game may explain his comments (not meant for posting on blog for humourous purposes only)
http://bit.ly/dLlsE2
January 26, 2011 at 11:43 am
Great stuff!!
January 26, 2011 at 12:12 pm
Someone pointed out to me that Sky Sports have the moral high ground over the Church of England in terms of sacking sexist men…
January 26, 2011 at 2:12 pm
Lesley – I’m so sad to say this, but how right you are!
Anne.
January 26, 2011 at 3:41 pm
This is a terrific post. Thank you, it raises so many questions.
We all accept that terrorism is fuelled by many things, eg. history, politics, culture, poverty. But I think this is the 1st time I’ve heard an explicit admission that religion is a significant component of such violence (“the hard violence doesn’t deter people who are convinced they (a) have nothing to lose and (b) are earning heaven by blowing themselves up”).
I may be wrong here, and I look forward to being corrected.
I’m not sure that sacking Andy Gray is unimportant. Our own society changes slowly, it is evolution not revolution.
Andy Gray’s prejudices will not change, but the story will make some people think about their own attitudes; children might ask their parents some simple questions, and their own beliefs might change as a result.
20 years ago, the idea of gays & lesbians kissing on mainstream TV was unthinkable.
Putin & co. cannot bomb terrorists into submission. I agree, but can terrorists bomb governments into submission? I don’t know.
I loved Kelly’s comment.
KK
January 26, 2011 at 4:04 pm
Kevin, where have you been? Religion as a component of violence is so obvious that it is mentioned everywhere. Indeed, the problem is that some commentators assume that religion is ONLY associated with violence or that violence always has a religious component – neither of which is true.
January 26, 2011 at 7:44 pm
I don’t have Sky, and I loathe all sports (except for Wimbledon fortnight – but that’s more about the champagne and strawberries) but I agree wholeheartedly that public scrutiny and the ironic use of gender stereotyping are a good way of pointing to the sexism prevalent in a male-dominated institution…
…Or I could just like wearing red suede heels with a clerical collar.
Being blonde, I often get confused, so I’m not sure.
January 27, 2011 at 9:42 am
Erica – I don’t think being blonde is a symptom of confusion (nor wearing red suede heels with a clerical collar). There are a few confused male clergy around too!
Anne.
January 28, 2011 at 8:20 am
I guess Keys and Gray haven’t become MSPs over-night. Once again a ‘crime’ seems to be being found out, not committing it. Others must have known what they were like but nobody had a quiet word. Love the idea of the 2 hour interview.
January 28, 2011 at 1:59 pm
Nick, Hi & thanks for the clarification (which I think I anticipated?). It is important.
Please don’t worry too much about where I have been. I have been reading about a prophet called Joseph Smith and an angel of the Lord called ‘Moroni’.
K
January 29, 2011 at 9:45 am
Kevin K – perhaps you should try reading Mark’s Gospel next?
Anne.
January 29, 2011 at 11:10 am
Didn’t Richie Valens write a song about that angel? here’s the first line.
I got a girl name of Boney Maroni
She’s as skinny as a stick of macaroni
Ps I’ve read The Book of Mormon I got given it by a pair of them. They said they’d come back and discuss it with me. They did but only the once. It’s hard to believe that intelligent people believe such tosh.
January 29, 2011 at 1:51 pm
Anne, SteveH, thanks for the replies.
Anne, I was taught the Christian Bible (and the Jesus story in particular) at school and I do know the basics, but why do you recommend Mark’s gospel in particular ? (just curious).
Steve, I agree, I too cannot understand why intelligent people believe in such nonsense. And thanks for the hint, when I need to read the Book of Mormon I will visit the local LDS church rather than Amazon.
K
January 31, 2011 at 7:16 pm
Kevin K – because Mark’s gospel is brief, direct and action-packed. Jesus almost comes striding off the pages as you read it.
Anne.
February 7, 2011 at 2:45 pm
David Dimbleby has been offered employment by BBC until he’s 77 – Anna Ford retired a few years ago before the BBC pushed her out because she was no longer ‘glamorous’. Still a man’s world isn’t it?
Anne.