One of the benefits of not living in London is that traveling to London allows time to read. My Inbox is empty, my desk is clear, correspondence is all done and I am ready for Christmas. And now the’s just catch-up to play with the books, papers, articles and briefings that haven’t quite found their way to the top of the pile.
So, coming down to London (I’m doing Pause for Thought on the BBC Radio 2 Chris Evans Show and then meetings tomorrow before getting back to speak at the Bradford City FC Carol Service at Bradford Cathedral in the evening) got me reading a pile of papers. All very important and worthy stuff and I feel better for having read it all. But, I got to my hotel and stuck the telly on… and that’s where the perspective changed.
I don’t usually watch awards shows, but this one captured me. I switched straight in to ITV’s A Night of Heroes: The Military Awards 2011 and listened to the story of a reservist paramedic who saved the life of a soldier in Afghanistan who had been shot in the head by a Taleban sniper. This was followed by four seriously injured soldiers who raised funds for charity by walking unaided to the North Pole (with Prince Harry).
I have to admit to a deep unease with the way in which the word ‘heroes’ is being used in relation to our military adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. From the safety of comfortable England I wouldn’t be so insensitive as to question the language used to draw attention to the people who don’t have the luxury of sitting in an armchair and doing semantic criticism. But, watching this awards ceremony makes it clearer than ever that people are not heroes for simply being in a place of conflict – that’s what they signed up for. Heroism comes in when people, with disregard to their own survival, put their life on the line to save someone else. To do this when people are shooting at you is one thing – you can hear from the stories how the adrenalin cuts in and you do something extraordinary. But, to do it again and again – conscious of the real fear and the potential cost – that is heroism.
These stories are astonishing. Seeing the human emotion in relationships forged by shocking violence is powerful.
But, the contrasts are also there to be seen on the screen. The audience includes glamorous telly stars and footballers (OK, I spotted Frank Lampard, Jeremy Clarkson and some dancer from Strictly Come Dancing)… but I just wonder how the pay of these extraordinary soldiers and medics compares with the pay of the media stars.
I’m not being bitchy. I just wonder what it says about our values and how we reward those who do the ‘harder’ job. Silly question, I know. But, it seems wrong that soldiers who have given life and limb at the command of politicians have to rely on charities to support them when they return to what we loosely call ‘civilisation’.
For the first time I feel we are watching real heroes… without having to quibble with the wording. These stories put the trivia of most of our superficial culture into perspective. (And I still hope the Military Wives get the number one spot at Christmas.)
December 21, 2011
Heroes
Posted by nickbaines under Language | Tags: Afghanistan, Chris Evans, heroism, ITV, military, Military Wives |[4] Comments
Advertisement
December 22, 2011 at 7:58 am
“But, the contrasts are also there to be seen on the screen. The audience includes glamorous telly stars and footballers (OK, I spotted Frank Lampard, Jeremy Clarkson and some dancer from Strictly Come Dancing)… but I just wonder how the pay of these extraordinary soldiers and medics compares with the pay of the media stars.”
Fair question. Who pays these so-called “stars” and how are they funded?
December 22, 2011 at 8:24 am
It was a good show and humbling as well. The self-sacrificial nature of the actions of these people reminds us of how much of that self-sacrifice we are capable of, but never do – it’s to hard, it’s to inconvenient, it doesn’t fit in with our lifestyle.
Those military personnel are hero’s in it’s true sense of the word, but the other form of heroism, is the voluntary service given by so many unsung hero’s in lots of different contexts within the church, charities, overseas missions and aid. The make a difference, quietly and unassumingly for the greater good. I just wish that they would receive some more attention, as their example would inspire others to join in.
December 26, 2011 at 5:01 pm
Dear Bishop – You seem to be suggesting that heroes, however defined, should be supported by the state rather than by charities and that over-paid ‘stars’ should be taxed. Surely it is our grossly inefficient state that fails these heroes and charities that should be praised and encouraged.
I was not clear why you mention Jeremy Clarkson in this context. As a founding patron of Help for Heroes he deserves particular praise: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/399180/Jeremy-Clarkson-Support-Help-for-heroes.html
Kind regards
Peter
January 3, 2012 at 12:41 pm
Peter Chadwick, thanks for your comment and apologies for the delay in responding. I am indeed suggesting that the state should look after its casualties better and that such people should not simply rely on charities for some basic support. It is the state (politicians) that sends these people into war and it is the state (defined as ‘us’ collectively) who should pay for the consequences. How that is done (and through which channels) is a moot question, but the obligation seems obvious.